Wednesday, March 25, 2020

words forms defined


The word "church" is substituted for a translation of the Greek word ecclesia in every place it appears in the NT Scripture with the exception of three instances; all three found in Acts 19:32, 39, and 41. Look at these passages and check the marginal notes in your Bible, if it has such, and you will see that the word "assembly" or "congregation" are both acceptable English translations of the Greek word ecclesia. 

The word "ecclesia" cannot be translated by the word church because it does NOT have the same meaning. A church is a religious organization or institution; or, the word is often used to refer to a building built by men, where people go to do their religious services. Again let me emphasize that the word "church" should not be in Scripture since it translates no word in the Greek text. Jesus did not die for a church or religious organization of any kind! He died for you and me; that is, for all the people who ever lived and who will live in the future. The C of C church, which is constituted of several sects, is simply a man-designed denomination just like all the other churches of today. Men have "birthed" every CHURCH that exists today. God has no church or denomination of any kind. Church members "belong to the church" of their choice, NOT to Jesus Christi Jesus has no religious institution or church!

In view of the above, it should be obvious to all honest hearts that there is no pattern In the scripture for setting up a church institution of any kind. The "pattern" followed today by all brands of churches, including the various C of C sects, is borrowed from the organizations and corporate structures in today's business world. The organization provides the mechanism for controlling the people and keeping them in submission to the institution, its rulers and clergy. The church organization today provides these clergymen -- the hired, professional preachers, with employment and a livelihood! They are employed, with a job description, just like the employees of any other business or organization. The Eldership, the rulers or corporate officials, sets the conditions of their employment, their duties, and pays their salary. Few, if any, will "bite the hand that feeds them."

Let me state a vital FACT: Every time the word ecclesia is used in connection with A CITY it is always singular! Let me cite some examples:

1)"the ecclesia of God which is at Corinth ..." (1 Cor. 1:2)
2)"the ecclesia In Jerusalem" (Acts 15:4, 22)
3)"the ecclesia of the Thessalonians" (1 Thess. 1:1).
4}"the ecclesia In Ephesus" (Rev. 2:1)
5)"the ecclesia in Smyrna" (Rev. 2:8)
6)"the ecclesia in Pergamum" (Rev. 2:12)
7)As well as the ecclesia {always singular!) in the cities of Thyatira, Sardis, and in Philadelphia.

Never do you read in Scripture of a plurality of ecclesias in any city! Let that sink in and think of its significance. There was only one ecclesia in a city and it was NOT an institution or an organization. The one ecclesia in each city constituted, or was made up of, ALL THE SAINTS in that city. In Jerusalem there were thousands of disciples and they all made up the ONE ecclesia of Christ in that city! The same was true of every other city. For certain there was no such thing as a Northside Ecclesia of Christ or a Main St. Ecclesia of Christ in any city. They had no organized or even an unorganized CHURCH in any city, for no such thing as a CHURCH existed in that age! I emphasize again that all churches are from men, none are from God!

Today it is very different. There are churches of many brands and kinds in almost every city in this nation, as well as all over the world. NOT ONE OF THEM IS ANY PART OF THE ECCLESIA OF CHRIST! They are all human institutions or organizations ruled and controlled by men. They do not belong to Jesus Christ. He has no part in such human organizations and religious systems. THERE IS NO CHURCH IN GOD'S WORD! Church of Christ churches are human institutions just like all the other denominations.

The Ecclesia, having a LIVING Faith, is made up of --


". . lively stones, built up a spiritual house, an holy priesthood, to offer up spiritual sacrifices, acceptable to God by Jesus Christ."


Matthew 16:18.

The Catholics built a dogma around Matthew 16:18, claiming that that verse refers to the Catholic Church. Later, non-Catholics have copied that “true church” dogma, and applied it to their own churches. But, that dogma is not true, neither in its Catholic version nor in its non-Catholic copies.

As was noted earlier, the word “church” is not a translation of the word ekklêsia which we find in the Greek text of the New Testament. – Let us consider the use of the word ekklêsia in the New Testament, and in Matthew 16:18 in particular.

In the Greek text of the book of Acts, the Epistles and the book of Revelation, the noun ekklêsia is often used of the first century believers’ fellowships, but when it comes to Matthew 16:18, it refers to something different. The immortal ekklêsia or assembly which Jesus said he would form (the one against which the gates of hadês would not prevail), does not consist of mortals, but of Jesus and the first century believers who have been made into immortals. (Well, it could be that that assembly includes even other immortals.)

The story begins in Matthew 16:13. The subject is neither a “church” nor the apostle Simon Peter. The subject is Jesus himself, the question being, “Who do men say that I, the Son of Man, am?” and also, “But who do you say that I am?”

Wycliffe used in his 1395 translation the word “church” (chirche), but for instance Tyndale (1525) did not. Tyndale translated the Greek word ekklêsia as “congregacion”. Well, even he used the noun “church” – twice, in Acts 14:13 and 19:37 which both refer to buildings connected to idol-worship.

This was where the temple of Jupiter was mentioned ….amazing when no one was looking,

Thursday, March 12, 2020

unholy hand maid's of compromise


Maier, (was) a devout Lutheran Christian (Fludd was a devout Anglican). . .  Whatever else they may represent, Fludd and Maier are most certainly Hermetic philosophers, representing a kind of Hermetic Renaissance at a time when the original Hermetic impulses of the earlier Renaissance were waning in some quarters.”  

“Maier may have been influenced by a (Giordano) Bruno tradition as well as by the Dee tradition.  We know that Bruno claimed to have founded a sect of ‘Giordanisti’ among the Lutherans. (See Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition, pp. 312-13) Maier was a Lutheran; his intensively Hermetic religious movement might therefore have included some Bruno influence, might be an attempt at the Hermetic reform of religion, the infusion of greater life into religion through the Hermetic influences, such as Bruno had so passionately advocated.  On the other hand the strongly alchemical aspect of Maier’s movement points to Dee as the major influence.  Perhaps in the Palatinate type of Hermetic reform, currents descending from the Dee type of Hermetic tradition mingle with a Bruno type.” 

This new philosophy is about to be revealed to the world and will bring about a general reformation.  The mythical agents of its spread are the R. C. Brothers.  These are said to be reformed German Christians, devoutly evangelical.  Their religious faith seems closely connected with their alchemical philosophy, which has nothing to do with ‘ungodly and accursed gold making’, for the riches which Father Rosencreutz offers are spiritual; ‘he doth not rejoice that he can make gold but is glad that he seeth the Heavens open, and the angels of God ascending and descending, and his name written in the Book of Life.’”  ((trust in christ alone , spirit led ))),