True sir I can see the gooned masses of Milton's lost world become a dangerous reality to us today!
a scary mess it is .. next phase sir !!!! utter insanity ... well said sir
This is How Society Will Normalize Cannibalism
Dostoevsky once said,
“If God didn’t exist, everything is possible.” There is wisdom in his
observation since, without God, there would be nothing to serve as the ultimate
reference for human acts. The eternal law that God established in the universe
is inscribed on the human heart. Thus, everyone at all times and places knows
right and wrong. Take away God, and all will fall into the most barbaric
savagery.
Modern secular society officially denies that God exists.
Thus, society comes to accept the cruelest practices by breaking down the
natural repugnance that comes from transgressing God’s law.
Abortion and infanticide, for example, used to incite
horror among civilized people. Now, it is accepted everywhere. Some taboos
remain, but these are now being questioned. Indeed, few could imagine that a
mainstream news magazine like Newsweek would
propose rethinking the idea of
cannibalism.
Eating Flesh: The Ultimate Taboo
Eating human flesh is the subject of a feature article.
Psychologists Jared Piazza and Neil McLatchie of England’s Lancaster University
declare there is nothing unethical or unreasonable about the practice. The
problem with cannibalism is people’s attitudes since they are often “overridden
by our feelings of repulsion and disgust.”
The reasoning behind the outlandish conclusion reveals the
atheistic premises of the authors and the scientific establishment. The main
title of the article says it all: “Cannibalism is common in the animal kingdom.”
Thus, there is no logical reason why it should not be allowed for humans.
Living creatures from spadefoot tadpoles, praying mantises,
chimpanzees to lions cannibalize their own. The human is just another animal
like all others.
The problem is humans have always had a horror for
cannibalism that transcends biological reasons. Because they cannot think in
spiritual terms, the two scholars resort to “scientific” theories that turn the
aversion into a psychological problem. Humans are generally not cannibals, they
claim, because “[o]ur capacity to represent the personalities of the living and
the departed is unparalleled. This deep connection between personhood and flesh
can mean that careful reasoning in certain situations over the merits of
cannibalism is overridden by our feelings of repulsion and
disgust.”
The Presence of the Soul
In other words, people perceive the presence of a soul in
the body that represents the spiritual qualities of personality, rationality and
immortality. They sense it is wrong to violate the body that houses this noble
part of the human being. People see no “merit” in cannibalism; they see
sacrilege.
From a spiritual perspective, revering the body is logical
and necessary. People have immortal souls. There will be a resurrection of the
dead. This requires a reverence for the body which will be glorified. For this
reason, people have always buried the body and respected the
dead.
Adapting to Accept the
Unacceptable
The nonchalance with which the two scientists deal with the
subject is indeed shocking. To them, a human being is only matter. The failure
to use this flesh for food is irrational. If cannibalism is consensual, they
claim, there should be nothing wrong with it. Post-mortem consensual cannibalism
might even be a sign of respect to the dead if the person permitted another to
eat body parts after death.
Satanic Christ Porn-blasphemy at Walmart — Sign Petition
The problem is not a moral one but an adaptive one, they
say. Just as butchers and morticians accustom themselves to deal with blood and
gore, Piazza and McLatchie “suspect that we could adapt to human flesh if need
be.”
The two scholars claim there is now no immediate need for
overcoming human repugnance for cannibalism. However, the Newsweek article opens
the door for cannibalism to enter into the mainstream by presenting it as
reasonable and natural. Other professors and scholars on the fringes are already
echoing the need for cannibalism. Indeed, Swedish behavioral scientist Magnus
Söderlund has suggested that eating people after they die could be a way of
fighting climate change, which they blame on the meat and farming
industry.
The debate introduces the notion of consensual
post-mortem cannibalism into a society where anything consensual is
permissible.
Worst of all, the scholars deny that the human being has
another side that is spiritual, superior, and unending. This superior side is
what makes every person unique and establishes human dignity. This gives rise to
political, social, cultural, and religious activities and sciences that tower
above mere biological existence and ultimately lead to eternal
salvation.
The cannibal’s acceptance
prepares for Dostoevsky’s world where everything, even the most
horrendous things are
possible.
yikes !!! thanks last days!!?
No comments:
Post a Comment